Impact of Hatch Spacing on Channel Depth Uniformity in Glass Microfluidic Chips Marked with 355 nm UV Laser
In the realm of microfluidics, precision and uniformity are paramount, particularly when it comes to the fabrication of glass microfluidic chips. The use of 355 nm ultraviolet (UV) lasers for marking these chips offers a high degree of precision, but the parameters must be meticulously controlled to achieve optimal results. This article delves into the impact of hatch spacing, specifically comparing 10 µm and 30 µm intervals, on the uniformity of channel depth in glass microfluidic chips marked with a 355 nm UV laser.
Introduction
Glass microfluidic chips are widely used in various applications, including diagnostics, chemical analysis, and biological assays. The precision of the channels etched into these chips can significantly affect their performance. UV lasers, with their ability to ablate materials with high precision and minimal heat-affected zones, are ideal for creating these细微 channels. However, the process parameters, such as hatch spacing, play a crucial role in determining the quality of the etching.
Hatch Spacing and Its Role
Hatch spacing refers to the distance between adjacent laser pulses on the target material. In the context of glass microfluidic chips, this parameter directly influences the depth and uniformity of the etched channels. A smaller hatch spacing, such as 10 µm, results in a higher overlap of laser pulses, which can lead to a more uniform channel depth. Conversely, a larger hatch spacing, such as 30 µm, may result in less overlap and potentially less uniform etching.
Experimental Setup
To investigate the impact of hatch spacing on channel depth uniformity, a controlled experiment was conducted using a 355 nm UV laser marking system. Glass microfluidic chips were marked with two different hatch spacings: 10 µm and 30 µm. The laser's pulse energy, repetition rate, and scanning speed were kept constant to isolate the effect of hatch spacing.
Results and Analysis
The results showed that channels etched with a 10 µm hatch spacing exhibited a higher degree of uniformity in depth compared to those etched with a 30 µm hatch spacing. The higher pulse overlap in the 10 µm spacing allowed for a more consistent removal of material, resulting in a smoother and more uniform channel profile. In contrast, the 30 µm spacing led to a more sporadic ablation pattern, causing variations in channel depth.
Surface Roughness and Uniformity
The surface roughness (Ra) was also measured for both sets of channels. Channels etched with the 10 µm hatch spacing had a lower Ra value, indicating a smoother surface finish. This is attributed to the more uniform distribution of laser energy across the channel area. The 30 µm hatch spacing resulted in a higher Ra value due to the patchy ablation pattern.
Conclusion
The study demonstrates that hatch spacing has a significant impact on the uniformity of channel depth in glass microfluidic chips marked with a 355 nm UV laser. A smaller hatch spacing of 10 µm is more effective in achieving uniform etching compared to a 30 µm spacing. This finding is crucial for the design and fabrication of glass microfluidic devices where precision and consistency are essential.
Recommendations
For applications requiring high channel depth uniformity, such as in glass microfluidic chips, it is recommended to use a 355 nm UV laser with a hatch spacing of 10 µm or less. This will ensure a more uniform and precise etching process, leading to improved device performance and reliability.
By understanding and controlling the hatch spacing, manufacturers can optimize their laser marking processes to produce glass microfluidic chips with the desired precision and uniformity, ensuring the highest quality and performance in their end applications.
.
.
Previous page: The Impact of Scanning Speed on Surface Roughness Ra in CO₂ Laser Marking of Glass Next page: Comparative Analysis of Microcrack Density in Glass Marking with 1064 nm Fiber Laser at Pulse Frequencies of 20 kHz and 100 kHz
Engraving Anti-Counterfeit Codes with a Laser Marking Machine
Enhancement of Coating Adhesion on Titanium Alloy Surfaces through Laser Texturing
Ensuring Contrast in High-Speed Aluminum Laser Marking at 2 m/s
Enhancing Aesthetics in Wood Laser Marking through Process Improvements
Dual-Head Laser Marking Machine: Simultaneous QR Code Marking on Both Sides of Copper Busbars
Choosing Between 3 W and 5 W UV Laser Marking Machines: A Comprehensive Guide
Enhancing Laser Marking on Ceramic Materials with Poor Light Absorption
Precision Marking on Flexible PCBs: The Role of MOPA Laser Marking Machines
Regression Analysis of Line Width and Depth in Glass Scale Marking with Picosecond 532 nm Laser
Controlling Haze Levels in Glass Sandblasting with 10.6 µm CO₂ Laser Marking
Achieving Colored Interference Fringes with 532 nm Green Laser Marking on Glass
Achieving White Marking on Glass Surfaces with 1064 nm Fiber Laser: Avoiding Micro-Cracks
Maintaining Transparency in High-Aluminum Silicate Glass with 266 nm UV Laser Marking
The Impact of Preheating on 1064 nm Fiber Laser Marking of Thin Glass